0 ftp code Holyoke Mutual Insurance Company v. Vibram USA, Inc. -Suffolk University Archive Video
Video for this case is not available.

Holyoke Mutual Insurance Company v. Vibram USA, Inc.

Argue Date: Tuesday February 6, 2018
*Summary:   Insurance Law-- Whether an insurance company was obligated to defend and indemnify its insured where the insured was sued for using the name of an Olympic gold medalist in advertising its running shoes.
Justices: Gants, C.J., Gaziano, Lowy, Budd, Cypher, Kafker, JJ.
Appellant: Vibram USA, Inc.
Counsel for Appellant: Steven P. Wright, Esquire Lindsay Sampson Bishop, Esquire James E. Scheuermann, Pro Hac Vice Attorney Lucas J. Tanglen, Pro Hac Vice Attorney
Appellee: Holyoke Mutual Insurance Company
Counsel for Appellee: Michael D. Riseberg, Esquire David Stanhill, Esquire
Court Appealed From: Suffolk Superior Court
Lower Court Judge: Mitchell H. Kaplan, J.
Route to SJC: Direct Appellate Review
Amici Curiae: Complex Insurance Claims Litigat

*Summary is not an official part of the court proceedings, it is presented so that those who access the website will have a general understanding of the legal issues in the case.

Access published opinions      -     View SJC Docket Information     -