0 ftp code Archer v. Grubhub, Inc. -Suffolk University Archive Video
TEST

Archer v. Grubhub, Inc.

SJC-13228
Argue Date: Monday May 2, 2022
*Summary:   Arbitration-- Whether delivery drivers for Grubhub, a food ordering and delivery service, are required to arbitrate their claims that Grubhub violated Massachusetts wage laws.
Justices: Budd, C.J., Gaziano, Lowy, Cypher, Kafker, Wendlandt, Georges, Jr., JJ.
Appellant: Grubhub, Inc.
Counsel for Appellant: Daniel S. Field, Esquire Catherine Scott, Esquire Alexandra Pichette, Esquire Theane Evangelis, Pro Hac Vice Attorney Blaine H. Evanson, Pro Hac Vice Attorney Joshua M. Wesneski, Pro Hac Vice Attorney
Appellee: Veronica Archer
Counsel for Appellee: Eric LeBlanc, Esquire Michaela C. May, Esquire
Court Appealed From: Suffolk Superior Court
Lower Court Judge: Brian A. Davis, J.
Route to SJC: Sua Sponte Transfer from Appeals Court
Amici Curiae:  

*Summary is not an official part of the court proceedings, it is presented so that those who access the website will have a general understanding of the legal issues in the case.

Access published opinions      -     View SJC Docket Information     -      Download Caption text